Chances of defaulting on a nuclear loan guarantee are better than 50/50.

The 2005 Energy Policy Act (you remember, the one written in Dick Cheney’s office?) sets up an $18 billion fund to provide loan guarantees to companies that want to build new nuclear plants. Prior to its passage, however, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) had issued a report in 2003, estimating what the chances were that a new nuke would default on its loan guarantee. Here’s what the CBO said:

CBO considers the risk of default on such a loan guarantee to be very high—well above 50 percent.
 
Bad as that news is for those wanting to build new reactors, the situation may be worse than that. The CBO made a number of assumptions in its estimates, starting with this:
 
 For this estimate, CBO assumes that the first nuclear plant built using a federal loan guarantee would have … associated project costs of $2.5 billion.
 
To give you some idea how far this is from current reality, San Antonio’s electric utility, which was poised for a major investment in the new units proposed for the South Texas Nuclear Project, withdrew its participation and sued NRG, the owner of STNP, when the project cost estimates reached $18 billion for the two new units.
 
 
 Another assumption in the CBO estimate does not bode well for STNP:
 
 We expect that such a plant … would employ a reactor design certified by the NRC prior to construction.
 
 In fact, the two reactors at STNP are scheduled to be Advanced Boiling Water Reactors (ABWR’s), a design not yet certified by the NRC, and of which there are only a handful around the world, all in Japan. And the NRG design differs significantly from the Japanese ABWR’s.
 
 

 

Advertisements

About Robert Singleton

By day, I work for a call center. In my spare time, I try to save my hometown (and planet) from a nearly constant onslaught of greedheads, lunatics and land developers. I live in a fictional town called Austin, Texas, where I go to way too many meetings.
This entry was posted in Finance and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s